 The Universal Struggle between
Christianity and Secular Humanism.
In recent years the denigration and vilification
of Bible believing Christians and religious fundamentalists has become
a growth industry In Australia the electronic and newsprint media has
been largely the facilitator of this attack rather than a moderating voice.
A Queensland science teacher informed a student
that he had no place in his biology class because he had creationists
beliefs.
University Christian leaders and chaplains
in Australia have experienced mounting pressure from administrators to
limit evangelical activity.
The religious liberty legal battlefield has become a
new "growth industry" in the United States. In Australia there
are also ominous signs that religious liberties are being increasingly
undermined. A growing number of reports indicate a rising level of hostility
towards Christians, with intimidation and vilification now becoming more
widespread.
In response to this legitimate concern a number of Christian
legal bodies have emerged in the U.S. to meet the challenge, and others
outside the United States are seeking similar legal protections.
Some question whether there is even a problem and theorise that the horror
stories of religious persecution are exaggerated. Others take the matter
seriously, and in the United States Christians have given sacrificially
to protect religious liberties.
But what are the so-called "religious liberty
wars" really about? Is there really a threat to the rights
of religious persons in America and Australia? In order to understand
the issues, and the way Christian lawyers are using their skills to serve
Christ and protect religious liberties, we need to recognise the areas
where religious liberties are at risk, and what precautions we can take
in Australia to meet some of the "religious liberties wars"
now being waged in the United States:
Public Schools: Besieged by depleted
funds and staff shortages, American public schools must determine how
best to cope with drugs, dysfunctional families and asocial children,
premarital sex and pregnancies, AIDS, homosexuality, and so on. In the
midst of these difficult issues, groups like the American Civil Liberties
Union threaten schools with financial devastation for permitting activities
such as Bible clubs, pro-life clubs and community religious organisations'
access to public school facilities.
Besieged by depleted funds and staff shortages schools must determine
how latest to cope with drugs dysfunctional families and asocial children,
premarital sex and pregnancies, AIDS, homosexuality, and so on.
As a result of this pressure, the public schools often deny religious
groups access to their facilities on the same terms as nonreligious organisations,
despite clear Supreme Court decisions and federal law to the contrary.
For example, at University High School in Tucson, Arizona, students were
denied permission to make their Bible study group an official school club
until The Rutherford Institute pointed out that the school's denial of
the Bible club was not only a violation of students' constitutional rights,
but a violation of the Equal Access Act as well. " There is increasing
pressure in public schools to remove any mention of religion," said
Douglas Drury, the attorney in charge of the case. "The local governing
bodies need to make sure that students don't lose their constitutional
rights when they walk through the school door." The drive to eradicate
religion from the schools has also resulted in public school efforts to
deny parents the right to direct their children's education.
Beliefs. State and municipal agencies
continue to interfere with the rights of private citizens to choose how
and with whom they should live. One case involved a Wisconsin woman who
was penalised $8,000 by an administrative law agency for placing an allegedly
discriminatory classified housing ad for a "Christian handyman"
to rent the upper level of her home. The woman said she didn't intend
to discriminate; she had merely wanted a tenant who could help her remodel
her 100-year-old house in exchange for low rent. As a Christian, she felt
an obligation to help other Christians first, although she said she wouldn't
have discriminated against any stable person who applied.
Rights and Custody/Visitation. US Courts
sometimes consider religion and Home Schooling deciding factors in custody
decisions. One case in Fort Myers, Florida, involved a judge who granted
a father custody of his child instead of the mother because their child
was receiving a Christian education under the mothers care.
Free Speech on Pro-Life Issues. The
infringement and restriction of free speech in connection with pro-life
views continues as some types of pro-life expression become criminalized.
Marilyn Hatch, a prolife protester, was convicted of a crime under the
newly enacted Freedom of Access to Clinic Entrances Act for peacefully
standing and sitting in front of an abortion clinic, although she made
no attempt to physically obstruct the entrance to the clinic. "Protesting
legal abortion through nonviolent expression and expressive conduct should
be protected under the First Amendment," said Rene Wright, the Rutherford
Institute attorney who conducted Hatch's defence in the criminal case.
Free Speech. is perhaps most clearly
seen in the cases where the government continues to restrict the right
to discuss religious issues and distribute religious literature. Over
and over again, people are being persecuted for sharing their faith, as
in the case of two teenagers who were thrown out of a shopping mall because
they were sharing their faith with customers who had consented to hear
what they had to say. In another instance, police arrested four street
preachers on a disturbing-the-peace charge. The preachers were leading
an evangelistic outreach to persuade passersby to put their faith in God
and cease their public drunkenness and their use of illegal drugs.
Employment Discrimination. Employers
are increasingly terminating and censoring employees who, on religious
grounds, resist employer programs requiring the affirmation (not just
toleration) of homosexuality and the censorship of pro-life views in the
work place. Some employers are even restricting their employees off-duty
religious activities, as in the case of Judith Lyn Soap, an employee of
the Oklahoma Department of Human Services. Soap's employer forbade her
from participating in a crisis pregnancy ministry at her church or any
other counselling related activities.
Church Rights/Zoning. Zoning laws are
being used increasingly across the U.S. to prevent or restrict home churches
and synagogues and other religious ministries. Soup kitchens, church day
care ministries, and homeless shelters are being attacked through the
use of zoning regulations.
These are many of the issues in the religious liberty
wars. Obviously, they are far more complicated and far-reaching than these
single issues. Despite rhetoric to the contrary, the issue is not simply
about Christians versus everyone else. The real issue is the conflict
between the religious and the secular. The gap between the two philosophical
views is rapidly widening. Secularists in positions of authority continue
to place restrictions on religious liberty.
Battle lines are drawn, but what are we fighting for?
If left unchecked, those with the greatest impact on society - leaders
in government, education, and the media - will increasingly become opponents
to any religious expression in the marketplace. This antagonism will inevitably
expand beyond evangelicals to include anyone who wishes to practice their
religious beliefs in public.
Constitutional Protections: It has been
revealed that most young people in the United States are unaware that
freedom of religion is protected under the Constitution. There are also
many Australians, Christians included, who do not realise that the Australian
Constitution provided similar protections. Most Australian citizens have
an extremely shallow knowledge of our Constitution and their constitutional
religious rights and freedoms. This lack of awareness means that major
cultural shifts, such as the loss of religious freedom, will continue
to go largely unnoticed by a significant segment of unconcerned, uninformed,
and apathetic Australians - many of whom are Christians.
Religious persons of all faiths must exercise and defend
their religious civil liberties in America and Australia. This means much
more than debating whether there should be a constitutional amendment
to protect the right to pray in public schools. It means that religious
persons must first understand the problem. Second, religious persons must
be convicted enough about their religion to care whether their free exercise
rights are infringed. Finally, religious persons must shed their apathy,
embarrassment, or fear and fight for their rights.
If religious people don't vigilantly guard their right
to free speech in Australian public life, religion will become an endangered
species permitted to exist only within the walls of a church. This, in
turn, will erode the psyche and character of the nation.
Adapted by John Heininger from an
article by Nathaniel Smith, a freelance reporter in Virginia.
|